All Issue

2023 Vol.28, Issue 4 Preview Page
31 December 2023. pp. 16-26
Abstract
Recently, there have been attempts to predict shock waves using high performance neural networks. Those studies have a limitation in that it is difficult to explain the internal operation process by using the deep learning model only as a black box model, making it difficult to understand. In this study, artificial intelligence was used to predict the type of the shock wave from the shape of the airfoil. To this end, a total of 500 airfoils were generated by changing eight variables using the Class/Shape-function Transformation(CST) parametrization method, and flow was solved using KFLOW. Using the analysis results, Multi-Layer Perceptron(MLP) was trained to predict the type of the shock wave from the airfoil geometry. Using eXplainable Artificial Intelligence(XAI) techniques Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanation(LIME), SHapley Additive exPlanation(SHAP), and Explainable Boosting Machine(EBM), the prediction results of the model were presented in an interpretable form. The analysis results obtained by applying LIME and SHAP to the MLP model were compared with the analysis results of EBM.. As a result of global and local explanation, it was confirmed that the influence of the variable in charge of the upper middle of the airfoil was the greatest on shock wave prediction.
References
  1. 2019, Kim B.S., Vinicius C.A., Nils T., Theodore K., Markus G. and Barbara S., "Deep Fluids: A Generative Network for Parameterized Fluid Simulations," Journal of Computer graphics forum, Vol.38, No.2, pp.59-70.https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13619
  2. 2021, "Deep Learning for Flow Prediction in Complex Engineering Applications." (George Em Karniadakis, 2018)
  3. 2019, Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P. and Karniadakis, G.E., "Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Deep Learning Framework for Solving Forward and Inverse Problems Involving Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations," Journal of Computational Physics, Vol.378, pp.686-707.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045
  4. 2023, Park H.S., Hwang W.T., Shin J.H., Cho K.W., Cho S.H. and Choi S.I., "Prediction of an airfoil flow field using artificial intelligence technique and a reduced-order model," KSCFE, Vol.28, No.1, pp.25-34.https://doi.org/10.6112/kscfe.2023.28.1.025
  5. 2022, Cihat D., Handle A. and Ozgur U.B., "A deep learning approach for the transonic flow field predictions around airfoils," Journal of Computer & Fluids, Vol236, pp.1-32.
  6. 2004, Lent, M.V., Fisher, W.C. and Mancuso, M., "An Explainable Artificial Intelligence System for Small-unit Tactical Behavior," IAAI 04, pp.900-907.
  7. 2019, Gunning. D. and Aha. D., DARPA’s Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Program. AI Magazine, Vol.40, No.2, pp.44-58.https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v40i2.2850
  8. 2020, Alejandro B.A., Natalia D.R., Javier D.S., Adrien B., Siham T., Alberto B., Salvador G., Sergio G.L., Daniel M., Richard B., Raja C. and Francisco H., "Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI," Journal of Information Fusion, Vol.58, pp.82-115.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012
  9. 2020, Chen, H.-Y. and Lee, C.-H., "Vibration Signals Analysis by Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Approach: Application on Bearing Faults Diagnosis," IEEE Access, Vol.8, pp.134246-134256.https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3006491
  10. 2018, Adadi, A. and Berrada, M., "Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)," IEEE Access, Vol.6, pp.52138-52160.https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052
  11. 2016, Marco T.R., Sameer S. and Carlos G., ""Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier," NAACL 2016, pp.97-101.
  12. 2017, Scott L. and Lee S.I., "A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions," Advances in neural information processing systems (2017), Vol.30.
  13. 2019, Harsha N., Samuel J., Paul K. and Rich C., "InterpretML: A unified framework for machine learning interpretability."
  14. 2022, Hong, Y., Lee, D., Yee, K., and Park, S.H., "Enhanced high-order scheme for high-resolution rotorcraft flowfield analysis," AIAA Journal, Vol.60(1), pp.144-159.https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J060803
  15. 2004, Park, S.H. and Kwon, J.H., "Implementation of kw turbulence models in an implicit multigrid method," AIAA journal, Vol.42(7), pp.1348-1357.https://doi.org/10.2514/1.2461
  16. 2008, Kulfan, B.M., "Universal parametric geometry representation method. Journal of aircraft," Vol.45, No.1, pp.142-158.https://doi.org/10.2514/1.29958
  17. 1979, Cook, P.H., McDonald, M.A., Firmin, M.C.P., "Aerofoil RAE 2822 - Pressure Distributions, and Boundary Layer and Wake Measurements," Experimental Data Base for Computer Program Assessment, AGARD Report AR 13.
  18. 2017, Jameson A., "Origins and further development of the Jameson–Schmidt–Turkel scheme," AIAA Journal, Vol.55.5, pp.1487-1510.https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J055493
  19. 1984, Sobieczky, H. and Seebass, A.R., "Supercritical airfoil and wing design," Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, Vol.16.1, pp.337-363.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.16.010184.002005
  20. 2001, Ahn, J.W., Kim H.J., Lee D.H. and Rho O.H., "Response surface method for airfoil design in transonic flow," Journal of aircraft, Vol.38.2, pp.231-238.https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2780
  21. 2005, Michael H. and Antony J., "Exploring the limits of shock-free transonic airfoil design," 44rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit.
  22. 2023, Fu, Junjie, et al., "The Bump Suppression Strategy for the Transonic Buffet of the Supercritical Airfoil," AIAA Journal, Vol.66(2), pp.808-830.
Information
  • Publisher :Korean Society for Computational Fluids Engineering
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국전산유체공학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Computational Fluids Engineering
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국전산유체공학회지
  • Volume : 28
  • No :4
  • Pages :16-26