All Issue

2026 Vol.31, Issue 1 Preview Page

Original Article

31 March 2026. pp. 41-53
Abstract
References
1

2002, Ferziger, J.H. and Peric, M., Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, 3rd edition, Springer, New York.

2

2007, Hirsch, C., Numerical Computation of Internal & External Flows, 2nd edition, B-H publications, Burlington.

3

2007, Versteeg, H.K. and Malalasekera, W., An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2nd edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Harlow.

4

1997, Toro, E.F., Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg.

5

2002, Jemcov, A., Stephens, D.W. and Wahono, S., “A High-Resolution Primitive Variable Solver for Compressible Flow Simulation,” AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, AIAA 2020-0567, Orlando, Florida.

10.2514/6.2020-0567
6

2015, Kraposhin, M., Bovtrikova, A. and Strijhak, S., “Adaptation of Kurganov-Tadmor Numerical Scheme For Applying in Combination With the PISO Method in Numerical Simulation of Flows in a Wide Range of Mach Numbers,” Procedia Comput. Sci., Vol.66, p.43.

10.1016/j.procs.2015.11.007
7

2016, Ong, K.C. and Chan, A., “A pressure-based Mach-uniform method for viscous fluid flows,” Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn., Vol.30, No.7-10, p.516.

10.1080/10618562.2016.1245417
8

2017, Kim, T.W. and Gill, J.H., “Development of Improved Pressure-Based Solver Algorithm for Compressible Flow,” J. Comput. Fluids Eng., Vol.22, No.4, p.28.

10.6112/kscfe.2017.22.4.028
9

2006, Liou, M.S., “A sequel to AUSM, Part II: AUSM+-up for all speeds,” J. Comput. Phys., Vol.214, No.1, p.137.

10.1016/j.jcp.2005.09.020
10

2022, Krishnan, M., Ray, A. and Peetala, R., “Numerical Analysis of High Speed Flow Applications using Various Flux Schemes,” Trends Sci., Vol.19, No.18, p.5813.

10.48048/tis.2022.5813
11

2013, Xisto, C.M., Páscoa, J.C. and Oliveira, P.J., “A pressure-based method with AUSM-type fluxes for MHD flows at arbitrary Mach numbers,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, Vol.72, No.11, p.1165.

10.1002/fld.3781
12

2014, Xisto, C.M., Páscoa, J.C. and Oliveira, P.J., “A pressure-based high resolution numerical method for resistive MHD,” J. Comput. Phys., Vol.275, p.323.

10.1016/j.jcp.2014.07.009
13

2000, Kurganov, A. and Tadmor, E., “New High-Resolution Central Schemes for Nonlinear Conservation Laws and Convection-Diffusion Equations,” J. Comput. Phys., Vol.160, Issue 1, p.241.

10.1006/jcph.2000.6459
14

2021, Shin, J.R. and Kim, T.W., “Enhanced Pressure Based Coupled Algorithm to Combine with Pressure-Velocity-Enthalpy for all Mach Number Flow,” Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci., Vol.22, p.489.

10.1007/s42405-020-00337-9
15

2019, Ajaero, C.U., “Validation of the Kurganov-Tadmor/Kurganov-Noelle-Petrova Scheme for Rotating Detonation Engine Simulations using OpenFOAM,” Master’s Thesis, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

16

2020, Marzouk, O.A., “The Sod gasdynamics problem as a tool for benchmarking face flux construction in the finite volume method,” Sci. Afr., Vol.10, e00573.

10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00573
17

2020, Fleischmann, N., Adami, S. and Adams, N.A., “A shock-stable modification of the HLLC Riemann solver with reduced numerical dissipation,” J. Comput. Phys., Vol.423, 109762.

10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109762
18

http://www,openfoam.com, KEYSIGHT, Bracknell, UK.

19

2002, Leveque, R.J., Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems, Cambridge University Press.

20

1978, Sod, G.A., “A survey of several finite difference methods for systems of non-linear hyperbolic conservation laws,” J. Comput. Phys., Vol.27, Issue 1, p.1.

10.1016/0021-9991(78)90023-2
21

https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/wind/valid/archive.html, NPARC Alliance Verification and Validation Archive, NASA.

Information
  • Publisher :Korean Society for Computational Fluids Engineering
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국전산유체공학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Computational Fluids Engineering
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국전산유체공학회지
  • Volume : 31
  • No :1
  • Pages :41-53
  • Received Date : 2026-01-02
  • Revised Date : 2026-01-26
  • Accepted Date : 2026-02-26