All Issue

2023 Vol.28, Issue 3 Preview Page
30 September 2023. pp. 8-17
Abstract
A computational study for improving aerodynamic performance was conducted by optimizing the airfoil shape of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). The baseline airfoil, FX73-CL2-152, was selected, and based on this shape, a Kriging approximation model and genetic algorithm were used to find an airfoil shape that maximizes lift and minimizes drag. The optimized airfoil shape was applied to a full-scale model similar to the MQ-1 Predator, and it was confirmed that the lift coefficient and endurance factor increased by 9.5% and 7.3%, respectively. These results demonstrate that the optimization of the airfoil can significantly contribute to the overall performance of the UAV, including reducing takeoff and landing distances, improving structural stability, and increasing fuel load. Furthermore, this research could contribute to enhancing UAVs' operational capabilities and mission performance in various mission environments. In the future, this research can be extended to the optimal design and computational analysis of a full-scale model applied to multi-element airfoils equipped with flaps. It can also be utilized in building a high-accuracy aerodynamic database using high-fidelity DES/LES models.
References
  1. 2019, Shakhatreh, H., Sawalmeh, A.H., Al-Fuqaha, A., Dou, Z., Almaita, E., Khalil, I., Othman, N.S., Khreishah, A. and Guizani, A.M., "Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): A Survey on Civil Applications and Key Research Challenges," IEEE Access 7, Vol.7, pp.48572-48634.https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2909530
  2. 2020, Mohamed, N., Al-Jaroodi, J., Jawhar, I., Idries, A. and Mohammed, F., "Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Applications in Future Smart Cities," Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol.153, 119293.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.004
  3. 2020, Outay, F., Mengash, H.A. and Adnan, M., "Applications of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Road Safety, Traffic and Highway Infrastructure Management: Recent Advances and Challenges," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol.141, pp.116-129.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.09.018
  4. 2008, Budiyono, A., "Advances in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Technologies," International Symposium on Intelligent Unmanned System, Vol.52, No.1, pp.1-40.
  5. 2020, Gaffey, C. and Bhardwaj, A., "Applications of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Cryosphere: Latest Advances and Prospects," Remote Sensing, Vol.12, No.6.https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12060948
  6. 2021, Ramanan, G., Krishnan, P.R. and Ranjan, H.M., "An Aerodynamic Performance Study and Analysis of SD7037 Fixed Wing UAV airfoil," Materials Today: Proceedings 47, pp.2547-2552.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.051
  7. 2014, Coder, J.G. and Maughmer, M.D., "Comparisons of Theoretical Methods for Predicting Airfoil Aerodynamic Characteristics," Journal of Aircraft, Vol.51, No.1, pp.183-191.https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C032232
  8. 1997, Wolfe, W.P. and Ochs, S.S., "CFD Calculations of S809 Aerodynamic Characteristics," 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA paper 97-0973.
  9. 2004, Park, Y.M., Kim, Y.S., Chung, J.D. and Lee, J.Y. "Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Airfoils Using Response Surface Method," Aerospace Engineering and Technology, Vol.3. No.2, pp.248-255.
  10. 2020, Seong, D.G., Juliawan, N., Tyan, M., Kim, S.H. and Lee, J.W., "Flying-Wing Type UAV Design Optimization for Flight Stability Enhancement," Journal of the Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Vol.48, No.10, pp.809-819.https://doi.org/10.5139/JKSAS.2020.48.10.809
  11. 2021, Phiboon, T., Khanhwa, K., Petcharat, N., Phosombat, N., Kanazaki, M., Kishi, Y., Bureerat, S. and Ariyarit, A., "Experiment and Computation Multi-Fidelity Multi-Objective Airfoil Design Optimization of Fixed-Wing UAV," Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, Vol.35, No.9, pp.4065-4072.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-0818-3
  12. 2006, Secannell, M. and Suleman, A., "Design of Morphing Airfoil Using Aerodynamic Shape Optimization," AIAA Journal, Vol.44, No.7, pp.1550-1562.ttps://doi.org/10.2514/1.18109
  13. 2000, Magagnato, F., "SPARC Manual (Structured PArallel Research Code)," Department of Fluid Machinery, University of Karlsruhe.
  14. 2014, Ganesh Ram, R.L., Cooper, Y.N., Bhatia, V., Karthikeyan, R. and Periasamy, C., "Design Optimization and Analysis of NACA 0012 Airfoil using Computational Fluid Dynamics and Genetic Algorithm," Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol.664, pp.111-116.https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.664.111
  15. 1981, Harris, C.D., "Two-Dimensional Aerodynamic Characteristics of the NACA 0012 Airfoil in the Langley 8 Foot Transonic Pressure Tunnel," No.NASA-TM-81927.
  16. 2016, Rumsey, C.L. and Morrison, J.H., "Goals and Status of the NASA Juncture Flow Experiment," AVT-246 Specialists Meeting on Progress and Challenges in Validation Testing for CFD, No.STO-MP-AVT-246.
  17. 1951, Krige, D.G., "A Statistical Approach to some basic mine Valuation Problems on the Witwatersrand," `Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Vol.52, No.6, pp.119-139.
  18. 1963, Matheron, G., "Principles of geostatistics," Economic Geology, Vol.58, pp.1246-1266.https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246
  19. 1989, Sack, J., Welch, W.J., Mitchell, T.J. and Wynn, H.P., "Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments," Statistical Science, Vol.4, No.4, pp.409-435.https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177012413
  20. 1975, Holland, J.H., "Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Contorol, and Artificial Intelligence," MIT Press.
  21. 1978, Hicks, R.M. and Henne, P.A., "Wing design by numerical optimization," Journal of Aircraft, Vol.15, No.7, pp.407-412.https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58379
Information
  • Publisher :Korean Society for Computational Fluids Engineering
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국전산유체공학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Computational Fluids Engineering
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국전산유체공학회지
  • Volume : 28
  • No :3
  • Pages :8-17