All Issue

2023 Vol.28, Issue 4 Preview Page
31 December 2023. pp. 84-91
Abstract
An aerodynamic analysis was performed for the effect of prop-to-pod distance on the oscillating aerodynamic force of the lift prop system in hover using computational fluid dynamics methodology. The aerodynamic forces of the prop and the pod oscillated by the aerodynamic interaction between the prop and the pod, which were caused by the increased pressure on the lower surface of the blade as the prop blade passes over the pod and the increased pressure on the upper surface of the pod due to downwash of the prop. The oscillating aerodynamic forces were generated at 2/rev due to the prop with two blades. As the distance between the prop and the pod increases, the aerodynamic interaction between the prop and the pod decreases, so the amplitude of the oscillating aerodynamic force of the prop and pod also decreases. The frequency analysis of the oscillating Fz aerodynamic component showed that the amplitude was the largest at the BPF of the prop, 2/rev, and decreased at the BPF and harmonic frequencies as the distance between the prop and the pod increased.
References
  1. 2019, Choi, C.W., "Configuration Design and Performance Analysis for the OPPAV," Proceeding of the 2019 KSAS Fall Conference.
  2. https://wisk.aero/genrations/
  3. 2020, Zawodny, N.S. and Boyd Jr., D.D., "Investigation of rotor-airframe interaction noise associated with small-scale rotary-wing unmanned aircraft systems," Journal of the American Helicopter Society, Vol.65, No.1, pp.1-17. 10.4050/JAHS.65.012007
  4. 2021, Whelchel, J. and Alexander, W.N., "sUAS Rotor-Airframe Interaction," AIAA Aviation 2021 Forum, August 2-6, 2021.10.2514/6.2021-2212
  5. 2022, Caprace D.G., Ning, A., Chatelain, P. and Winckelmans, G., "Effects of rotor-airframe interaction on the Aeromechanics and Wake of a Quadcopter in Forward Flight," Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol.130, No.4, pp.1-8.10.1016/j.ast.2022.107899
  6. 2020, Kang, H.J., "Numerical Analysis of Aerodynamic Interactions in Hover for the Separation Distance Between Two Props," Journal of Computational Fluids Engineering, Vol.25, No.3, pp.95-101.10.6112/kscfe.2020.25.3.095
  7. 2021, Kang, H.J., "Numerical Analysis of Aerodynamic Interaction of Two Props Rotating with Different Phase Angles," Journal of Computational Fluids Engineering, Vol.26, No.3, pp.26-33.10.6112/kscfe.2021.26.3.026
  8. 2022, Kang, H.J., "Aerodynamic Analysis of the Tilt Prop in Transition Maneuver of the OPPAV," Journal of Computational Fluids Engineering, Vol.27, No.4, pp.1-8.10.6112/kscfe.2022.27.4.001
  9. 2022, Kim, E.M., Yang, J.Y., Lee, H.J., Kang, M.J., Myong, R.S. and Lee, H., "Numerical Prediction of Rotor-Airframe Interaction Noise," Journal of Computational Fluids Engineering, Vol.27, No.3, pp.79-88.10.6112/kscfe.2022.27.3.079
  10. 2022, SIEMENS, STAR-CCM+ Ver. 17.06.008.
Information
  • Publisher :Korean Society for Computational Fluids Engineering
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국전산유체공학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Computational Fluids Engineering
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국전산유체공학회지
  • Volume : 28
  • No :4
  • Pages :84-91